Menu

Education Today Logo


newsletter

Education Today Cover Browse Issue

Automarking 'methodologically flawed and massively incomplete'

News Image

The NSW Teachers Federation claims that ACARA is rushing through with plans to have robots mark next year’s NAPLAN tests despite their justifications being discredited by world-leading research. A report by Dr Les Perelman from Massachusetts Institute of Technology decribes the plan as 'methodologically flawed and massively incomplete'.

Acting President of the Federation Gary Zadkovich said: “Parents, teachers and principals have not been consulted about these radical plans and students have not been prepared for such a dramatic shift. NAPLAN has been a high-stakes and controversial test and this latest development will further bewilder youngsters who are subject to such testing.

”The Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority announced in a newsletter that they intend to use computer-robots to mark the 2018 NAPLAN tests. In justification, they cited their own anonymous 2015 report that they claim guarantees that robots can mark children’s work just as well as teachers.

"However, the ACARA paper has been carefully examined by one of the world leaders in Assessment and Writing from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr Les Perelman, who describes the ACARA report as, “So methodologically flawed and so massively incomplete that it cannot justify any use of AES [automated essay scoring] in scoring the NAPLAN essays.”

Dr Perelman's report, commissioned by the The Federation, claims that robots can only detect low grade attributes of writing; cannot detect the most important elements of a text; the ACARA report uses evidence and data selectively and poorly and ignores any authority critical of robot marking; robots and humans should not be used in conjunction in marking; even robots as grammar checkers are seriously flawed; overseas evidence shows robot marking discriminated against some social groups; and introducing robots will encourage regressive teaching practices.

Responding to release of Dr Perelman's report, Dr Stanley Rabinowitz, general manager of assessment and reporting at ACARA, said all NAPLAN writing tasks completed online next year would be marked by a person as well as an automated scoring system.

He said ACARA had done further research since the 2015 report, including work based on Dr Perelman's research, which would be released next month. He defended ACARA's report and said Dr Perelman and the Teachers Federation "are known critics of automated marking systems and the report findings should be viewed with this in mind."


19 Nov 2019 | National
A better future through food News Image

When you think about it, most of what we do as people centres on food, it’s essential for life and how it is produced and consumed has huge implications for our future. Read More

14 Nov 2019 | National
Still great to be a teacher when it comes to jobs News Image

Again, you will be glad that you completed that teaching degree as once again one of the areas with the healthiest job growth has been education and training.
Read More

13 Nov 2019 | International
‘Brave’ new word for children in 2019 News Image

Uncertainty is plaguing the planet and that is reflected by Oxford University Press Australia & New Zealand selection of the 2019 Children’s Word of the Year: Bravery. Read More

13 Nov 2019 | National
Future proofing our response to depression in the young News Image

The Black Dog Institute is recruiting for its study Future Proofing, which is Australia’s largest-ever clinical trial into the effectiveness of mental health apps for preventing anxiety and depression in adolescents. Read More

13 Nov 2019 | National
Why we need more male teachers News Image

There are a lot of kids who are a bit light on males in their lives, the reasons are many and in a teaching environment introducing more males could be a good thing. Read More