With NAPLAN summary results now out, literacy expert Prof Beryl Exley says discussion needs to move beyond NAPLAN results to the impact of NAPLAN on children’s education.
Exley is National President of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association (ALEA), and Professor of English Curriculum and Literacy Education at Griffith University, Queensland.
“The focus of today seems to be on the NAPLAN results, but we have to turn the discussion to something more foundational,” said Exley. “NAPLAN has exhausted its usefulness. NAPLAN does not measure what it proposes to measure. It’s negatively affecting the schooling experience for students for up to eight years.
“We have hard evidence that in some schools students are spending up to 20 weeks preparing for NAPLAN. That’s 20 weeks where they are not undertaking the Australian Curriculum and that is a source of concern.
“Students aren’t motivated by the NAPLAN experience and it doesn’t tell teachers anything they don’t know from the other assessments that they roll out. Teachers are best place to decide on the form and timing of assessment.”
Meanwhile, assessment expert Assoc Prof Jihyun Lee suggests the government needs to do a better job explaining NAPLAN's purpose.
Lee is an associate professor at the UNSW School of Education, and is specialised in large-scale standardised testing, including NAPLAN and PISA. She is currently a TJA Research Fellow in the PISA division at the OECD, and will be working at the OECD-headquarters in Paris the remainder of this year.
In her view, the hubbub over the validity of NAPLAN results before their release was overblown. "The results did not show a catastrophic mistake because of the implementation of the online assessment," she said.
"But the fundamental issue is who supports its continuation. It appears that it has a strong support from the federal government, measurement experts, and a handful of academics.
"However, I believe that the government has not done a good job in explaining clearly what the main purpose of NAPLAN is and how the NAPLAN data are currently used beyond the school level. As long as the school information is not available publicly, NAPLAN can continue to be used."
Research on Year 1 reading program MiniLit found it did not have an additional impact on passage reading, but that there was evidence of significant improvement in foundational skills, particularly Letter Sound Knowledge. Read More
Teenagers can be uncommunicative and yourtown’s Kids Helpline is changing the way they speak with teens who may be experiencing mental health concerns by tapping into an innovative campaign. Read More
Love it or hate it, you can’t ignore the US and time spent working in the country is the kind of experience that colours a life. The cultural exchange organisation Participate Learning is making the process easier. Read More
The inaugural winners of the AI for Good Challenge have been announced, the challenge is a new national competition for high school students to tackle real world social and environmental challenges using Artificial Intelligence. Read More
They were supposed to be a paradigm of excellence but state-funded independent schools in the UK, known as academies, widen inequality and ‘degrade’ the teaching workforce. Read More