Menu

Education Today Logo


newsletter

Education Today Cover Browse Issue

Marshmallow test indicates SES not future success

News Image

In the entire history of pop science, the marshmallow test has yielded some of the cutest results.

We've all seen the vision of kids presented with the option of eating marshmallow now or waiting 15 minutes and getting two.

Whether the kids struggle and give into temptation and eat the lolly or stop themselves and receive the payoff is supposed to indicate the child’s future success, after all delayed gratification is at the centre of all achievement.

All well and good, but with the introduction of a wider test group and controls for socio economic background it looks like the ability to hold off indicates something more prosaic than self-discipline, the result actually indicated whether a kid comes from a rich or poor background.

What’s more the test reinforces that the strongest factor influencing a kid’s future success is whether they come from money or not.

During the 1960s and ’70s, the marshmallow test was carried out on about 90 children enrolled in a local Stanford preschool. Years later the team revisited their test subjects to examine the correlation between an early ability to delay gratification (as represented by holding out for the second marshmallow) and later success. The positive outcomes exhibited by those who resisted temptation included higher school leaving exam scores and lower body mass index.

The new study, led by New York University’s Tyler Watts and the University of California-Irvine’s Greg Duncan and Haonan Quan, features a rejigged version of the original test. Researchers increased the sample size to more than 900 children and included a more diverse array of individuals with a range of ethnicities, income and education levels. They also analysed results while considering background factors.

The researchers found there was very little to indicate that an ability to delay gratification correlated with greater potential in the future.

For the less well-off students, there is less certainty in day to day life. There might be food in the cupboard today, but there might not be tomorrow, so you’re probably better off eating the treat now.

While for kids who come from households with better education levels and more money, it’s easier to delay gratification: the probability is there will be a marshmallow to be had later if you want it.


14 Nov 2018 | National
Nowhere to run for cheaters News Image

While it’s prevalent at universities, cheaters’ days might be numbered as markers have shown themselves to be adept at indentifying which assignments are not the work of the student and the ability improves with training. Read More

14 Nov 2018 | NSW
Surf Lifesavers head Bush News Image

Over 6000 youngsters will get a taste of the beach when the 25th annual Beach to Bush program rolls into towns including Tamworth, Lismore, West Wyalong, Young, Moree, Gunnedah, Narrabri and Canberra. Read More

13 Nov 2018 | National
Catholic School Principals plan for future News Image

As the current crop of Catholic School Principals retires there’s concern that no one is stepping up to the plate, the Catholic Schools’ Middle Leadership Program addresses the development of new leaders. Read More

13 Nov 2018
Students asked which anti-smoking ads work best News Image

Quit Victoria’s annual Critics’ Choice initiative invites students to appraise anti-smoking ads and high school students are being called upon to get involved.
Read More

13 Nov 2018 | National
Program sees autistic toddlers thrive in mainstream kinder News Image

Toddlers with autism can thrive in normal kindergarten environments if provided with the correct scaffolding and La Trobe University’s Group-Early Start Denver Model (G-ESDM) looks to be one intervention that works well. Read More